RE: FW: [mpls] Last Call: 'Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) L abel -Controlled ATM and Frame-Relay Management Interface Definition' to Proposed Standard

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

Yes I did a quick check.

I had some nits, but I did not find it blocking enough for
IETF Last Call. And with this author, it might be good to
have someone else look at it too.

Bert

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-mreview@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-mreview@ops.ietf.org]On
> Behalf Of C. M. Heard
> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 21:31
> To: Mreview (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: FW: [mpls] Last Call: 'Multiprotocol Label 
> Switching (MPLS)
> Label -Controlled ATM and Frame-Relay Management Interface Definition'
> to Proposed Standard 
> 
> 
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> > GEN-ART (The General Area - Area Review Team) has started to
> > review documents at IETF Last Call time.
> > 
> > If we have a volunteer for this one, we can try to do the same?
> 
> One question:  hasn't this document been given a MIB Doctor review
> before going to IETF Last Call?  I thought that was the policy for
> all MIB documents.  Why would it be necessary to do that again at
> last call time?
> 
> Mike
> 
>