RE: 484 octet limit (was: [802.1] MSTP MIB - mstpMapTable)

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

> Hi -
> 
> > From: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
> > To: "Mreview (E-mail)" <mreview@ops.ietf.org>
> > Cc: "Keith McCloghrie" <kzm@cisco.com>
> > Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 3:42 PM
> > Subject: Re: 484 octet limit (was: [802.1] MSTP MIB - mstpMapTable)
> ...
> > My question, then is this:  is the problem sufficiently important to
> > warrant recalling the MIB review guidelines document from the RFC
> > Editor's queue and going through another last call?
> ...
> 
> No.  We'll always be accumulating wisdom about how to review MIBs.
> Let's save this one, if we get agreement on it, for inclusion 
> in a future
> update.  It has already taken too long to get this document published.
> 

I agree with Randy, let us NOT recall the document from the
RFC-Editor queue. If we need to do a revision, we can always do so
later. I see that David Perkins added another set of possible
review guidelines. They (if we get consensus on them) could be 
part of a future revision of the RFC-to-be as well. We know
from experience that it takes us a long time to agree on 
certain guidelines, so let us work on that first before 
even talking about an update.

Bert
> Randy
> 
> 
> 
>