RE: Updated xml2rfc

["Glenn Waters" <gww@nortel.com>]

Maybe I'm not ready the XML correctly but I don't see the reference
style that Bert suggested. Am I not reading this right?

Thanks, /gww 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-mreview@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-mreview@ops.ietf.org]
On
> Behalf Of David B Harrington
> Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 13:07
> To: 'Mreview (E-mail)'
> Subject: Updated xml2rfc
> 
> Hi,
> 
> A new experimental version of xml2rfc is available online at
> http://xml.resource.org/experimental.html
> 
> It is being updated to meet some of the rfc2223bis requirements. There
> is a directive to use the rfceditor style: <?rfc rfcedstyle="yes">,
> and it handles some issues such as when to use two spaces, whether to
> capitalize "this" in a section header, how to spell acknowledgements,
> etc. to meet the style choices of the RFC Editor.
> 
> It allows appendices before the references, and moved Author's Address
> to just before the IPR statement. The References sections are still
> numbered (which looks really weird with appendices in the middle. ;-)
> 
> I updated my template and tested this version. See what you think
> about this output?
> 
> David Harrington
> dbharrington@comcast.net