[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FW: Internal WG Review: Recharter of Security Issues in Network E vent Logging (syslog)

Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:


I am/was checking with MIB doctors.
And got back the below.
So I guess it does show interest in the protocol spec from the some NetConf people. We can off course ask for explicit 
expressions of such support when we do IETF review of the
proposd charter.


Let me clarify.
Although there is some strong interest from a few people,
there is WG consensus that a NETCONF notification
will be encoded in XML, and have the same PDU format regardless
of the application mapping used (SSH, BEEP, or SOAP).


Bert


Andy


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-mreview@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-mreview@ops.ietf.org]On
Behalf Of Andy Bierman
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 15:14
To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
Cc: Mreview (E-mail)
Subject: Re: Internal WG Review: Recharter of Security Issues in Network
Event Logging (syslog)


Hi Bert,

Can you clarify the standards status of draft-ietf-syslog-protocol-16.txt?
I'm confused -- it appears this WG document is part of the re-charter.
There are some people in the NETCONF WG that want to leverage
this work and not reinvent it. 
thanks,
Andy


MIB Doctors,

This is still in internal IESG/IAB review.
But if any of you has early comments, pls do send them asap
(before Thursday 11am EST). I recall that we had some
discussion about overlapping/similar/ work during our OPS area
meeting.

Specifically, do we have insights into:

- it is not clear many people plan to implement a syslog
protocol that is not at least minimally compatible with
the existing syslog messages.

- is there sufficient community interest, reviewer interest
and implementer interest to charter this work.

- It seems the document quality of the new syslog protocol
is good. If they can get sufficient review and implementation
it seems that standardizing something in this space would be
desirable.

- There is also MIB work going on see below

- proposed charter (although some text is missing at the
beginning) below.

Bert