[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: MIB checkers

To: "David T. Perkins" <dperkins@dsperkins.com>
Subject: Re: MIB checkers
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 22:42:26 +0100
Cc: Andy Bierman <ietf@andybierman.com>, dbharrington@comcast.net, "'Mreview (E-mail)'" <mreview@ops.ietf.org>
Fcc: =SENT
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10601311254100.22071-100000@shell4.bayarea.net>
Mail-followup-to: "David T. Perkins" <dperkins@dsperkins.com>, Andy Bierman <ietf@andybierman.com>, dbharrington@comcast.net, "'Mreview (E-mail)'" <mreview@ops.ietf.org>
References: <43DFCCC3.2080408@andybierman.com> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10601311254100.22071-100000@shell4.bayarea.net>
Reply-to: j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.10i

On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 01:03:04PM -0800, David T. Perkins wrote:

> There are behaviors that I don't like of older versions
> of smilint. Can we get those changed if smilint is made
> the "IETF MIB checker"?

If you have suggestions or even patches for improving smilint, I
suggest to send an email to the libsmi mailing list as that is the
proper place for such messages.

If you have general considerations what should be checked to improve
the IETF MIB work, you might want to discuss that in general terms on
this mailing list.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany

References:
- Re: Target times for MIB Doctor Review
  - From: Andy Bierman <ietf@andybierman.com>
- Re: MIB checkers
  - From: "David T. Perkins" <dperkins@dsperkins.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Target times for MIB Doctor Review
Next by Date: RE: Help getting CAPWAP MIB doc plan started
Previous by thread: Re: MIB checkers
Next by thread: Re: MIB checkers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread