Re: Pls check and comment: draft-ietf-mboned-msdp-mib-01.txt (Experim ental)

["Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>]

Hi -

> From: "David T. Perkins" <dperkins@dsperkins.com>
> To: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
> Cc: "Mreview (E-mail)" <mreview@ops.ietf.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 10:31 AM
> Subject: Re: Pls check and comment: draft-ietf-mboned-msdp-mib-01.txt (Experim ental)
...
> I believe that we have talked about this topic many times,
> and the approach that should be done is to have the
> "RowStatus" object have a syntax clause that is
>  SYNTAX     RowStatus { active(1), destroy(6) }
>
> Thus, I believe that it is inappropriate that
> the syntax of the "RowStatus" object be
>   SYNTAX     RowStatus
> and then have a MODULE-COMPLIANCE has shown
> below.
...

The key question is whether they want to *forbid* implementations
from supporting creation.  If that is their intent, then the suggested
change makes sense.

Randy