[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Time to Revise the TC list

To: "Wijnen, Bert \(Bert\)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>, "Mreview \(E-mail\)" <mreview@ops.ietf.org>, <ietfmibs@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Time to Revise the TC list
From: "Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 10:58:34 +0300

Yes, I believe that 

VlanIdOrAny, 
VlanIdOrNone, and 
VlanIdOrAnyOrNone

from Q-BRIDGE-MIB in RFC 4363 would be useful additions. 

Dan

 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:bwijnen@lucent.com] 
> Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 12:28 AM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); Mreview (E-mail); ietfmibs@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Time to Revise the TC list
> 
> Did we not do something fro VlanID and VlanIDOrNone and some 
> such as well, These can also be of generic use I think.
>

Prev by Date: RE: Time to Revise the TC list
Next by Date: FW: Last Call: 'Link Management Protocol (LMP) Management Informa tion Base (MIB)' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc4327bis)
Previous by thread: RE: Time to Revise the TC list
Next by thread: RE: Time to Revise the TC list
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread