RE: MIB EDU training in Montreal

["Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)" <dromasca@avaya.com>]

The targeted audience is broader including potential MIB editors and
other parties that may consider doing MIB modules in their WGs. Yet I
also am of the opinion that the level of the material donated by Bert is
quite close to what is needed. 

Dan


 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Harrington [mailto:ietfdbh@comcast.net] 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 8:22 AM
> To: 'Wijnen, Bert (Bert)'; Romascanu, Dan (Dan); mreview@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: RE: MIB EDU training in Montreal
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I think this looks like a good start. It is a bit dated (the AD has
> changed) but otherwise it looks very appropriate to WG chairs 
> training. If it will be presented to potential editors and 
> other WG participants, then it probably could be made more generic.
> 
> It might be good to work on the presentation to identify 
> issues of concern to MIB editors, in particular. This could 
> happen over time as the presentation is given at multiple IETFs.
> 
> If Bert and David P. do not wish to give the presentation, I 
> would be willing to do so. I think Bert, as ex-AD, would be a 
> good person to do this presentation since it is currently 
> focused on WG chairs.
> 
> dbh
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-mreview@ops.ietf.org
> > [mailto:owner-mreview@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 12:36 AM
> > To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); mreview@ops.ietf.org
> > Subject: RE: MIB EDU training in Montreal
> > 
> > 
> > OK, My material that I have is the slides that I presented 
> to the IETF 
> > WG chairs training session at IETF60.
> > 
> > I think they would need to be updated a bit for the new (general) 
> > audience. The question is if this is the proper level of 
> detail or the 
> > proper set of topics for a first education session or not.
> > 
> > Anyone, pls feel free to take the material and make 
> derivative work. 
> > And if any of you want to do the presentation, then that is 
> fine too.
> > 
> > Another thing that in my view would be important is that we should 
> > shoot at any presentation materials on this list, and try 
> to avoid to 
> > end up arguing during the education session (if we have one).
> > I am not saying we all have to agree on everything (although that 
> > would be good of course), but rather that we should not 
> start arguing
> during
> > a training session for the general IETF participants.
> > 
> > Slides (ppt) attached. If anyone needs PDF, pls let me know
> > 
> > Bert
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-mreview@ops.ietf.org
> > [mailto:owner-mreview@ops.ietf.org]On
> > > Behalf Of Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 06:12
> > > To: mreview@ops.ietf.org
> > > Subject: MIB EDU training in Montreal
> > > 
> > > 
> > > At the MIB Doctors lunch meeting (and call) in Dallas we talked 
> > > about a MIB writing and reviewing training session for Montreal.
> > Montreal gets
> > > dangerously close and we need to ask for a Sunday slot 
> and prepare 
> > > materials if we want to do it there. I remember Bert and
> > David Perkins
> > > mentioning that they could help with material and running
> > of the show,
> > > so please confirm you are still on the job. If there are other 
> > > volunteers please let us all know. I suggest that we post
> > and discuss
> > > materials on this list, so that the content and format is 
> agreed by 
> > > all MIB Doctors.
> > > 
> > > Dan
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> 
>