RE: Question on style of deprecating objects and tables

["Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)" <dromasca@avaya.com>]

I do not know if this is the rule, or if there is any rule, but I prefer
to leave the objects at their original location. 

Dan


 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-mreview@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-mreview@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of 
> jcucchiara@mindspring.com
> Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 1:44 AM
> To: mreview@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Question on style of deprecating objects and tables
> 
> 
> Hi Everyone,
> 
> When a MIB is being revised and scalar objects and tables 
> within the MIB module are being deprecated, should these 
> deprecated objects/tables be moved from their location in the 
> original MIB Module?
> 
> Currently, the author has done this and has a comment and put 
> a comment of
> -- Deprecated Objects
> 
> The downside as I see it is that the numbers are out of order 
> for a person reading the MIB.  The upside is that the 
> deprecated objects are sort of in their own section.
> 
> Just wondering what the current practices are?
> 
> Thanks,
> Joan
> 
> 
>