[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Question on style of deprecating objects and tables
- To: <mreview@ops.ietf.org>
- Subject: Question on style of deprecating objects and tables
- From: <jcucchiara@mindspring.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:44:11 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=mindspring.com; b=gFemA4Yhd0Yq95ogXAHj/zqkpOSpql7hf8a95MOAvCDHY4gcrjsldczeHaZ3btF7; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Hi Everyone,
When a MIB is being revised and scalar objects and tables
within the MIB module are being deprecated, should these
deprecated objects/tables be moved from their location
in the original MIB Module?
Currently, the author has done this and has a comment and
put a comment of
-- Deprecated Objects
The downside as I see it is that the numbers are out of order
for a person reading the MIB. The upside is that the deprecated
objects are sort of in their own section.
Just wondering what the current practices are?
Thanks,
Joan