Re: initial issues

[Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>]

Thomas Narten wrote:
> So for now, I think it would be good to stick with your first note,
> i.e., defining just what multihoming is and what its requirements are.

Thomas,

I half agree with you on these points, and I might even agree with you
100% depending on what you meant.  As we saw in the BoF in San Diego,
multihoming can mean different things to different people.  What it
boiled down to was this: multihoming at what level?  I believe we should
develop proposals that address this in their entirety so that we do not
make the same mistake we did years ago by excluding ideas that merely
needed time to mature or otherwise mutate into things more useful.  I
wouldn't want to take forever, but I also wouldn't want to move in
haste.

Comments?
--
Eliot Lear
lear@cisco.com