[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: initial issues



Thomas;

> > Anyone who disagrees with a group is considered an obstructionist by that
> > group.  I certainly have a preference, but no religion.  If I come to see
> > that GSE-like approaches are indeed not up to the task at hand, I too will
> > argue against them.  What I would hate to see, however, is a refusal to
> > investigate similar proposals to GSE or even to other, rejected solutions
> > simply because they were shot down years ago.
> 
> Well said and something we would all do well to keep in mind.
> 
> I think we're all here to look for solutions to a real pressing
> problem and we need to keep an open mind.

Ben once wrote:

>       i spoke briefly with thomas narten last night about #2, and
> while i lean towards believing some protocol changes could make our lives
> a lot easier, such an approach doesn't seem terribly feasible.  worth a
> shot, perhaps, but i don't hold out much hope.

that, according to Ben, you have had a closed mind.

But your mind is now open to protocol changes.

Good.

						Masataka Ohta