[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: initial issues

To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Subject: Re: initial issues
From: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@eng.sun.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:20:56 +0100 (CET)
Cc: Sean Doran <smd@ebone.net>, rja@inet.org, multi6@ops.ietf.org
Delivery-date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 02:22:15 -0800
Envelope-to: multi6-data@psg.com
Reply-To: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@eng.sun.com>

> 2374 sec 3.1 is going fro draft status, says

2374 isn't being advanced to Draft Standard, which is what you seem to be
saying above. 
RFC 2373 aka draft-ietf-ipngwg-addr-arch-v3-04.txt is being considered
by the IESG for advancement to draft standard.

  Erik

>    "Top-Level Aggregation Identifiers (TLA ID) are the top level in the
>    routing hierarchy.  Default-free routers must have a routing table
>    entry for every active TLA ID ..."
> 
> this would seem to take a poorly-substantiated socio-political theory and
> mandate its enshrinement in the core of v6 routing.
> 
> randy
>

Prev by Date: Re: initial issues
Next by Date: Re: initial issues
Prev by thread: Re: initial issues
Next by thread: Re: initial issues
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread