[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: administrivia (on avoiding injury)
In your previous mail you wrote:
Before you implement, please answer these three questions:
| > Personally, I think it's reasonable to require a host change to switch to
| > another prefix when there is link failure.
World----ISPZ
| |
ISPA ISPB
\ /
site
|
host
How does host detect a link failure between ISPB and ISPZ?
How does host detect a link failure between ISPZ and World?
=> routing protocols (ie. a suitable BGP setup)...
When host detects either of these failures, how does it adapt
such that there is no lost connectivity to what can still be
reached through site's _still operating_ connection to ISPB?
=> the basic idea (already published/discussed) is to use router
renumbering (router-router) and autoconfiguration (router-host)
in order to spread the information (typically reduce the preferred
lifetimes of B prefixes to zero which does exactly what one wants)
inside the site. I don't know if there is running code implementing
this but on the paper (:-) this is no hard.
Regards
Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr
PS: the other way (World to host) is a bit harder if addresses in
B prefixes no more work: DNS cannot be updated for short-term...