Re: administrivia (on avoiding injury) (fwd)

[Margaret Wasserman <mrw@windriver.com>]

>As a transition strategy, NAT
>can be acceptable. As a permanent feature, we have to consider that VERY
>carefully. Many are trying to get people onto IPv6 to get them AWAY from
>NAT. If it's to be a permanent fixture, application protocol design will
>be severely affected.


NAT is already a permanent feature.  I think that the IETF needs to accept
this and act accordingly...

Margaret