Re: Regionally aggregatable address space for multihoming

[smd@ebone.net (Sean Doran)]

Randy Bush writes to Geoff Huston:

| > Randy, Do you have any suggestions as to an appropriate list to continue 
| > this discussion? Is ptomaine willing to tolerate a continuation of this 
| > discussion?
|
| i suspect 'encourage' would be a more appropriate word.

Swapping the WG hat for the RG hat, I invite you to discuss this
and ANY other Internet-routing-related topic on the open irtf-rr
interest list, details of which can be found at
http://www.irtf.org/charters/routing.html or 
http://puck.nether.net/irtf-rr/

Swapping back, multi6 is probably best off focusing on site 
multihoming for v6, although, Geoff, please bear in mind that it is
reasonable to argue that some form of traffic management 
might/ought to find its way into the forthcoming requirements draft,
or the forthcoming "how it's done in v4 today" draft, or both.

	Sean.