Pseudo "last call" for draft-ietf-ipngwg-ipv6-2260-02.txt

[Thomas Narten <narten@raleigh.ibm.com>]

The document "IPv6 multihoming support at site exit routers"
<draft-ietf-ipngwg-ipv6-2260-02.txt> came out of the IPng WG, which
has requested that it be published as an informational RFC. Given that
the subject of the draft overlaps with the main focus of this group,
we'd be interested in getting WG feedback on the contents of the
document. Namely:

 - is the document reasonable to publish as an informational RFC as
   is, or are some specific changes appropriate?

 - How feasible do the techniques described in the document appear to
   be from the perspective of an operator?

 - What are the main (if any) limitations to using the described
   techniques from an operational perspective? Are these limitations,
   if any, adequately described in the document?

Explicit feedback (including "looks fine to me") from all those who
read it would be helpful.

Sean & Thomas
Multi6 WG Chairs