Re: note from the iesg plenary

[Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>]

> it was noted that there has been little attention payed in the ietf
> to scoped addresses of various types in the ipv6 standard (e.g., link
> or anycast addresses).  
> 
> for our wg (from me, not from the floor): can these different address
> varities, when a host uses them, be considered as a form of
> multiple-address multihoming?  likewise, those approaches which change the
> routing system in some fashion: how can/do they deal with such addressing
> types?

routing as we know it, does not have sufficient scoping / reachability
constraint mechanisms to handle the seeming semantics.

randy