RE: (multi6) requirements draft comments

["Michel Py" <michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>]

> Dec 18, 2001 at 09:26:09AM +0100, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Michel Py wrote:
> > This is vague indeed and I would not mind dropping 3.1.4 although it
> > does not bother me.
>
> I think it needs to stay in, but the phrase "or application, NNTP, for example, "
> should be deleted. That would leave the "example" sentence as
>    For example, customer C homed to ISP A may wish to shift traffic of a
>    certain class to ISP B as matter of policy. 
> which is necessary and sufficient IMHO.
>
> We could refine it further by saying "shift outgoing traffic" to make it
> clear that this is not policy based routing.
>
> Joe Abley wrote:
> This sounds good to me.

Sounds good to me too.
Michel.