On Wednesday, June 26, 2002, at 03:29 , Tony Hain wrote:
While I believe this document still assumes too much in terms of affecting policy outside the domain of direct administrative control, I have to agree it is time to ship it. There is one comment about the IESG in 3.2.7 that simply doesn't belong in any I-D, so I wouldn't be surprised when the IESG asks to have it changed or removed. If the words 'within the IESG' were removed, the sentence would stand and makes much more sense than worrying about IETF process in a mechanism requirements doc.
I have made that change in my working copy. Joe