On Wednesday, June 26, 2002, at 03:29 , Tony Hain wrote:
While I believe this document still assumes too much in terms of
affecting policy outside the domain of direct administrative control, I
have to agree it is time to ship it. There is one comment about the
IESG
in 3.2.7 that simply doesn't belong in any I-D, so I wouldn't be
surprised when the IESG asks to have it changed or removed. If the
words
'within the IESG' were removed, the sentence would stand and makes much
more sense than worrying about IETF process in a mechanism requirements
doc.
I have made that change in my working copy.
Does anybody have any other proposed changes to this document, or should
I roll a -04 with that change only, ready for wg last call?