RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development

["Michel Py" <michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>]

Brian,

> Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> I think we need the document, but since it does indeed contain
> conflicting requirements that will need tradeoffs, it clearly
> SHOULD NOT contain pseudo-normative language. I would suggest
> that all the upper case normative words should be replaced by
> shoulds and should nots in lower case, and then just ship the
> thing as Informational.

Replace "requirements" with "recommendations" and I'm with you.

Michel.