RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development

["Christian de Larrinaga" <cdel@firsthand.net>]

> Behalf Of Craig A. Huegen
> Noel asked if I could suggest any other mechanisms.  So far, all of the
> multi-homing solutions I can think of that are implementable with current
> code do not address the requirements that enterprises have:
> 
> * simple to implement and operate for the enterprise
> * network infrastructure visibility into alternative paths such that
>   policy decisions may be made on paths by the infrastructure, not the
>   host
> * unique, host-aware end-to-end addresses so poorly-written applications
>   (in use in IPv4 today) will work

true for all users (not just *enterprises*)

Christian