RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development

["Michel Py" <michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>]

> Randy Bush wrote:
> as i am not aware of anyone filtering v6 announcements
> at the moment (well, other than maybe at /48 or something),
> perhaps this wg should work on solutions to the routing
> problems presented and assume that, if reasonable aggregation
> is one of those goals and is met, that the isps will act
> rationally.

I and lots of other people filter at /35, soon to be /32 for the 2001::
space and at /24 or /32 (depending on the range) for the 3ffe:: space.
Which is perfectly in line with the whole idea of aggregation.

Michel.