RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development

["Michel Py" <michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>]

Tony,

> Tony Hain wrote:
> Is it the most efficient use of address space? No, and the
> document recognizes there is a clear trade-off being made
> between simplicity and efficiency. Are there other ways to
> achieve the listed goals? Probably, and when I see something
> that looks more operationally viable I will back off. 

I agree with your ideas, and they were a major contributor to this:
http://arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us/ipv6mh/geov6.txt

I suggest you accept the fact that the chances of getting the /4 you
need are zero. As I said before, I would be the strongest supporter of
your scheme if it stood a chance.

Michel.