[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development

To: Tony Li <Tony.Li@procket.com>
Subject: RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development
From: "Craig A. Huegen" <chuegen@cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 17:12:01 -0600 (Central Standard Time)
Cc: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>, Michel Py <michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>, "J. Noel Chiappa" <jnc@ginger.lcs.mit.edu>, <multi6@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <D2EC481073504E498A8DB9C0687E8CAF04D2237B@EXCHANGE0-0.na.procket.com>

On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, Tony Li wrote:

> So we're going to institutionalize support for layering violations?
> This doesn't seem right.

I would like for the answer to be "no".  At the same time, there is the
question of existing applications.  Will H.323 be completely re-written?

/cah

---
Craig A. Huegen, Chief Network Architect      C i s c o  S y s t e m s
IT Transport, Network Technology & Design           ||        ||
Cisco Systems, Inc., 400 East Tasman Drive          ||        ||
San Jose, CA  95134, (408) 526-8104                ||||      ||||
email: chuegen@cisco.com       CCIE #2100      ..:||||||:..:||||||:..

References:
- RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development
  - From: "Tony Li" <Tony.Li@procket.com>

Prev by Date: Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development
Next by Date: RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development
Previous by thread: RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development
Next by thread: RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread