[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development



  > >   > If the level of trust is zero to begin with, there should
  > >   > be no problem extending this "trust" so a third party.
  > 
  > > => Is this an argument for global PKI? Presumably
  > > this protocol would work between arbitray sites?
  > 
  > No, this is an argument for not building elaborate security 
  > mechanisms
  > when there is nothing to secure. 

=> Hmm, see below, now I have a _lot_ of questions :) 

If someone who I don't 
  > know visits my
  > web site 

=> Why do you assume you don't know this someone? 

or connects to my mail server, and then halfway through the
  > session the connection is transferred to another IP addres, 
  > why would I
  > care? 

=> Because:
- The new source address (that you'll reply to) could be someone 
else that will accuse you of bombing them
- Your server might be offering secure internet banking and 
suddenly it's not so secure
- You might be a popular server and all of a sudden people
can't reach you because their traffic is diverted to a victim.
Maybe the victim will become popular :) 

I'm pretty sure there are more reasons.

The only time this is dangerous would be when I 
  > communicate with a
  > trusted host but if this trusted host tells me it has 
  > another address
  > then presumably, I should trust this information as well. 

=> Yes but how did you establish that trust? 
The identifier used is the key problem here. 
Hesham@ericsson.com tells you nothing about 
whether I can divert traffic from 3ffe::1 to ABCD::1. 
This is the exact problem we had in MIPv6.

Obviously
  > things are different when someone at an address I don't 
  > know tells me
  > she is a trusted host. Then she has to present credentials.

=> Careful how you pick "credentials".

  > No, but that doesn't mean we have to start with this part.  :-)
  > 

=> oh no, it's MIPv6 all over again :) trust me if you
don't start thinking about this early on it won't be fun later !

Hesham