[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GSE

Iljitsch;

> There has been some talk about GSE in the past few days.

Hugh? Really?

> Before anyone
> gets too excited about this, let me point out some of the numerous
> prolems with this approach:

GSE is an approach with intelligent routers and hopeless that please
refrain from wasting bandwith on it.

> That being said, I think GSE could be a subset of a more general
> approach.

Wrong. Any approach containing GSE as a subset is worse than GSE.

> However, using identifiers with regular IPv6
> unicast semantics will make the transition a lot easier as it allows
> interoperability between multihoming-aware and non-multihoming aware
> systems and/or providing the multihoming support in separate boxes.

Transition from what? IPv4? OSI? Or?

Our 8+8 code interoperates with leagacy v6 one, but does it make
any sense?

							Masataka Ohta