[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GSE

On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Masataka Ohta wrote:

> > That being said, I think GSE could be a subset of a more general
> > approach.

> Wrong. Any approach containing GSE as a subset is worse than GSE.

With a solution that can work with any kind of structure for the
identifier it would be easy to implement GSE for those who still want
it, without betting all our cards on one horse or a cliche of similar
sentiment.

> > However, using identifiers with regular IPv6
> > unicast semantics will make the transition a lot easier as it allows
> > interoperability between multihoming-aware and non-multihoming aware
> > systems and/or providing the multihoming support in separate boxes.

> Transition from what? IPv4? OSI? Or?

Transition from existing v6.