RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development

["Michel Py" <michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>]

> Tony Li wrote:
> The competition will drive down cost.  And those folks
> who find net access to be a requirement for their daily
> lives, such as telecommuters, may well decide to MH.
> We see this already with certain netgeeks today.

I could not agree more. Although I get very good DSL service, I would
spend another $30 or $40 a month if there was a solution.

> Also, small businesses are also candidates for MH.

I have installed several small businesses that now process their credit
card transactions over the web. What we do for these is typically a
cable or dsl to backup the T1, egress only; it's only a matter of time
before these guys need a real multihoming solution too.

> Make sense?

To me, completely.

Michel.