Re: Transport multihoming

[Manuel Urueña Pascual <muruenya@it.uc3m.es>]

> I guess I was careless in my language, (and perhaps even muddy in
> my thinking).   With separate spaces, *address* "ownership" is not
> much a problem in the sense it is in MIPv6, but *ID* "ownership"
> certainly is.   While RR (Return Routability) works, to a degree,
> with *address* ownership, it certainly doesn't work with *ID*
> ownership (that is, if IDs are separated from locators).

Why not? I mean, the RR check can test both *ownerships*:
Send a cookie to the new locator, it should reply with the cookie plus
the ID, as long as IDs are related to single a connection thus unknown
for anyone other than connection peers. 

This is more a shared secret than a ID but, are IDs needed for something
else outside the connection context?

Of course I do refer neither DNS nor crypto certificates but a
multihomed-host ID.

--Manuel