Re: WG next steps

[Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>]

On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 03:10:41PM -0500, Michael H. Lambert wrote:
> >- We may want to consider multiple, complementary, and non mutually
> >  exclusive approaches to IPv6 multihoming, if we conclude that
> >  different approaches serve different sets of interests, or impose
> >  costs upon different parts of the elements and entities that the
> >  Internet comprises.
> 
> Yes!  It is not obvious that a single, monolithic, globally-optimal 
> solution is going to present itself before a (partial, at least) solution 
> must exist.

Most definitely.  Talk of a single solution is optimistic at best.  It
would be like there being only one transition tool in v6ops...

Tim