[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WG next steps

To: Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: WG next steps
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 01:40:48 +0100 (CET)
Cc: <multi6@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <3DD95E51.593865DA@hursley.ibm.com>

On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> > > The DSCP is definitely not available for that; please read RFC 2474.

> > Can you be more specific?

> Not really. If you don't want to read the diffserv Proposed Standard,
> you'll have to believe me: the DSCP isn't available to solve the
> multihoming requirement.

I want to and I did, but propably not thorough enough because I didn't
find what specifically you were referring to. I'll read the whole thing
more closely when I have more time and less distractions.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: WG next steps
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com>

References:
- Re: WG next steps
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com>

Prev by Date: RE: WG next steps
Next by Date: RE: WG next steps
Previous by thread: Re: WG next steps
Next by thread: Re: WG next steps
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread