[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Draft: PI addressing derived from AS numbers

To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Subject: Re: Draft: PI addressing derived from AS numbers
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 19:04:58 -0800
Cc: Michel Py <michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>, multi6@ops.ietf.org, Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0301302059230.18967-100000@netcore.fi>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0301302059230.18967-100000@netcore.fi>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021212

Ultimately the same (or very similar) routing decision process will occur, with the same complexity and the same problems, so I would agree with you assessments. Thus, while I understand the reasoning for the proposal, I would argue that perhaps the best thing to do is nothing until we have something better. That may be a while. Oh well...

But thanks..

Eliot

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Draft: PI addressing derived from AS numbers
  - From: Peter Tattam <peter@jazz-1.trumpet.com.au>

References:
- RE: Draft: PI addressing derived from AS numbers
  - From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>

Prev by Date: RE: Draft: PI addressing derived from AS numbers
Next by Date: Re: Draft: PI addressing derived from AS numbers
Previous by thread: RE: Draft: PI addressing derived from AS numbers
Next by thread: Re: Draft: PI addressing derived from AS numbers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread