[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GSE
However, the main concerns that held it up at the time were
about security. You probably want to get hold of
draft-ietf-ipngwg-esd-analysis-05.txt (I think -05 was the last
version.)
Brian
Eliot Lear wrote:
>
> Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> > - the draft as-is doesn't provide any actual multihoming benefits
>
> The point of the draft was that multihomed enterprises wouldn't ever be
> advertised into the dfz. If a site wanted to multihome it would have
> address prefixes from two providers, and those would get stamped on packets.
>
> > - how can we make the lower 64 bits of the address globally unique
>
> The same way we do with 32 bits.
>
> Eliot
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Brian E Carpenter
Distinguished Engineer, Internet Standards & Technology, IBM
On assignment at the IBM Zurich Laboratory, Switzerland
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GSE
- From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
- References:
- Re: GSE
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
- Re: GSE
- From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>