Re: Draft: PI addressing derived from AS numbers

[Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>]

On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, RJ Atkinson wrote:

> >  Whether people like
> > it or not, the product investments in RFC 2460 at this point oblige
> > any plausible solution to behave as an upgrade to plain 16.

> I'm not persuaded that is true.  Certainly I know a lot of IPv6
> deployed sites that are NOT taking the position above.

Are you saying you wouldn't mind significant changes in the IPv6 packet
format? This would essentially be IPv7.

In that case I have a few ideas...