Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56

[Peter Tattam <peter@jazz-1.trumpet.com.au>]

I am interested in completing a solution which I sketched out a couple of
months back, but my schedule is rather full so it won't be ready for the coming
IETF meeting, but I had planned on something by the next meeting.

Peter

On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Tim Chown wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> What is required to break the impasse of no progress within the IETF on
> multi6?
> 
> There are some good ideas in the "rebel" ipv6mh group (e.g. Christian's
> ideas for incremental solutions using existing tools).  Even the multi6
> chairs were seen in ipv6mh meetings :)
> 
> We really don't want to be appraoching IETF#57 with this bizarre situation
> continuing, or do we? 
> 
> Tim
> 
> 

--
Peter R. Tattam                            peter@trumpet.com
Managing Director,    Trumpet Software International Pty Ltd
Hobart, Australia,  Ph. +61-3-6245-0220,  Fax +61-3-62450210