[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Again no multi6 at IETF#56



Hi,

What is required to break the impasse of no progress within the IETF on
multi6?

There are some good ideas in the "rebel" ipv6mh group (e.g. Christian's
ideas for incremental solutions using existing tools).  Even the multi6
chairs were seen in ipv6mh meetings :)

We really don't want to be appraoching IETF#57 with this bizarre situation
continuing, or do we? 

Tim