[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56

To: "Bound, Jim" <Jim.Bound@hp.com>
Subject: Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 08:54:51 +0859 ()
Cc: Michel Py <michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>, Tony Li <Tony.Li@procket.com>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>, Bob Hinden <hinden@iprg.nokia.com>, multi6@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <9C422444DE99BC46B3AD3C6EAFC9711B03241031@tayexc13.americas.cpqcorp.net>from "Bound, Jim" at "Mar 14, 2003 05:58:27 pm"

Jim;

> I don't agree.  Not because I don't believe multi6 issues should not be
> done. But, because RIRs are dealing with free enterprise.

There ain't no such thing as a free Internet.

							Masataka Ohta

References:
- RE: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
  - From: "Bound, Jim" <Jim.Bound@hp.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
Next by Date: RE: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
Previous by thread: RE: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
Next by thread: RE: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread