Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56

[Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>]

drc;

> > IPng WG has no idea on addressing architecture for multihoming.
> > IPng WG has no idea on how global routing table size should
> > be managed.
> 
> Yes.  However, the RIRs have come under significant criticism in the 
> past for being perceived as road blocks to IPv6 allocations and have, 
> in fact, reduced the requirements for v6 space.  Even in this list, 
> they are criticized for making obtaining address space 'hard'.

Significant criticism by who?

The primary obstacles for IPv6 deployment have been:

	0) Supession, not reduction, of IPv4 address consumption.

	1) Complexity of protocol such as ND, IPsec and routing header
	useful for no meaningful purposes.

	2) People insisting on keeping complex useless features and not
	introducing necessary features.

> Seems they are damned if they do and damned if they don't.

They are never damned. There are other people to be damned.

							Masataka Ohta