RE: Again no multi6 at IETF#56

["Bound, Jim" <Jim.Bound@hp.com>]

You don't get it.  Your own country has IPv6 deployed as I depicted in
your native backbone.  You never will get it I fear.  Hope I can talk to
you face to face a the IETF to see if we can resolve.  I have a kanto
sword given to me my martial arts master should I bring it :--)

/jim

 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Masataka Ohta [mailto:mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp] 
> Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2003 12:41 AM
> To: Bound, Jim
> Cc: Tony Li; Michel Py; Randy Bush; Kurt Erik Lindqvist; Bob 
> Hinden; multi6@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
> 
> 
> Jim;
> 
> > >A new industry consortia is now in charge of IPv6?  Please,
> > >point us at it.  Figuring it out here is 'challenging'.
> > 
> > If this and many other specs do not begin to produce solutions in a 
> > timely manner then I predict there will be a deployment 
> body for IPv6 
> > to go work on those specs and send them to the IETF but not 
> with the 
> > intention of waiting for 4 years for them to complete but implement 
> > and work the IETF at same time.  So my statement was the 
> result of an 
> > "if".
> 
> 4 years?
> 
> 8 years have already wasted because some people has been 
> believing leagacy IPv6 were deployable.
> 
> 						Masataka Ohta
>