[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56

To: "Michael H. Lambert" <lambert@psc.edu>
Subject: Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 22:56:22 +0100
Cc: "Bound, Jim" <Jim.Bound@hp.com>, multi6@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <3996181.1047809189@[192.168.1.100]>

IPv6 deployment will not wait for multi-homing to be solved. [...]
I don't think multi-homing will wait for multi-homing to be solved, either. I'm sure there are many sites out there, not "knowing" there are problems with MH, that will blindly multi-home using PA addresses. And I bet many of them will be quite happy. What we need are reports of operational experience with PA MH.

Not only that, but it also works very well.

- kurtis -

References:
- RE: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
  - From: "Michael H. Lambert" <lambert@psc.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: comments on mipv6 application to multihoming [Re: Move forward]
Next by Date: RE: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
Previous by thread: RE: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
Next by thread: RE: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread