[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Again no multi6 at IETF#56

To: Jim.Bound@hp.com, multi6@ops.ietf.org
Subject: RE: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
From: "J. Noel Chiappa" <jnc@ginger.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 20:38:00 -0500
Cc: jnc@ginger.lcs.mit.edu

    > From: "Bound, Jim" <Jim.Bound@hp.com>

    > How does MIPv6 fit the model?

Because it separates location from identity.

	Noel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
  - From: Pekka Nikander <pekka.nikander@nomadiclab.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
Next by Date: Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
Previous by thread: RE: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
Next by thread: Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread