[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Again no multi6 at IETF#56



>     > I am suspect of the entire notion of the separation, 
> which just being
>     > technically accute having heard many solutions to this 
> over the years.
> 
> Those many solutions would includ MIPv6, right Jim?

How does MIPv6 fit the model?

Also I am not against trying I just said suspect.

WOuld like to see model though as I believe the two can be overloaded.
Maybe not.

/jim

> 
> 	Noel
>