RE: Again no multi6 at IETF#56

["Bound, Jim" <Jim.Bound@hp.com>]

I agree.  I am trying to get people to come here doing it now.  Seems to
be some kind of issue I don't get though.  Probably afraid to get
unproffessional mail responses is one comment I heard from the IETF
lists???  That's too bad.

/jim

 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael H. Lambert [mailto:lambert@psc.edu] 
> Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2003 10:06 AM
> To: Bound, Jim
> Cc: multi6@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
> 
> 
> --On Saturday, 15 March 2003 21:54 -0500 "Bound, Jim" 
> <Jim.Bound@hp.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> > IPv6 deployment will not wait for multi-homing to be solved. [...]
> 
> I don't think multi-homing will wait for multi-homing to be 
> solved, either. 
> I'm sure there are many sites out there, not "knowing" there 
> are problems 
> with MH, that will blindly multi-home using PA addresses.  
> And I bet many 
> of them will be quite happy.  What we need are reports of operational 
> experience with PA MH.
> 
> Michael
> 
> +-------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------+
> | Michael H. Lambert, Network Engineer           Phone: +1 
> 412 268-4960 |
> | Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center               FAX:   +1 
> 412 268-8200 |
> | 4400 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA  15213       
> lambert@psc.edu        |
> +-------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------+
>