Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56

[Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>]

Noel;

>     > From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
> 
>     >> If there is a choice in how to multi-home, then some folks will
>     >> inevitably choose the wrong way and we will again implode. 
> 
>     > We need apply the solution we have today with zero implementation. And
>     > I don't see any other alternative. six months from now we might have
>     > something better. Let's do that then.

Our LIN6 based scalable multihoming implementaion has been working
for about a year on the world largest mobile IPv6 environment
with more than hundred wireless routers and less than 10 users.

A problem is that we haven't written specification in English, yet. :-)

> The thing is that we don't need to do anything to allow people to do it the
> "current way" (i.e. let the routing handle it, al la IPv4 MH) - in fact, I
> doubt we could stop them, actually.

We can't stop them use IPv4 with IPv4-style multihoming. :-)

							Masataka Ohta