Re: Resolving geo discussions

["JORDI PALET MARTINEZ" <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>]

Right,

I'm following the discussion in "silent mode", because I've no cycles now with the preparation of several new projects, and the
Madrid Summit, in addition to my regular work in several projects ... not too much !

But I'm sure that other people from Euro6IX can also comment on this.

Anyway, if I survive to my actual 1-hour sleep time per day, at the end of the month, I will try to be more proactive.

Regards,
Jordi

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Chown" <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: <multi6@ops.ietf.org>
Cc: "Jordi Palet" <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2003 4:10 PM
Subject: Re: Resolving geo discussions


> On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 03:38:29PM +0200, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> >
> > I think it needs to build on the observation that there is no congruence
> > between network topology and geography to show that we have no way to make
> > geo addresses aggregate in practice. It doesn't need to be that long.
> > But since it's an abstract "why this doesn't work" argument, I think
> > it needs to be separate from any specific technical proposal.
>
> Well, geography meets topology at an IX, so the exchange-based addressing
> experiments being done by Euro6IX are interesting in this respect,
> possibly.   Perhaps Jordi can comment on that.
>
> Tim
>