Re: Resolving geo discussions

[Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>]

On onsdag, apr 23, 2003, at 07:33 Europe/Stockholm, Pekka Savola wrote:

> > Instead of reviewing proposals in depth it might make more sense
> > to task somebody with doing a compare and contrast between the 
> > different
> > proposals and use such a presentation as the focus for discussion.
> >
> > That approach tends to lead to more focus on the problem and the 
> > possible
> > approaches with less of "my proposal is better than yours" type of 
> > discussion.
> Totally agree here.
>
> We shouldn't discuss proposals, but rather talk in some "meta"
> multihoming level.
>
> We need to have better picture what we want and can do before getting 
> down
> to business and digging holes...
Maybe (most likely) this will be the outcome of Vienna. Still, I feel 
that given the time that have passed, and the fact that there are a 
number proposals out there, they deserve the chance to present them. I 
think I can already guess the outcome of this, but I think that 
although we need to agree where to move we also need to listen to 
peoples ideas on what the steps are. I personally like the idea of a 
number of design teams as a first step. But this is the discussion we 
need to have.

- kurtis -