Re: Resolving geo discussions

[Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>]

On Wed, 23 Apr 2003, Erik Nordmark wrote:
> > As for what should be included, well we (IMHO) need to change the 
> > charter, or at least look at doing so and update the milestones. There 
> > are a number or proposals floating around, of which not all even have 
> > made it as IDs. Having presentations of all in Vienna, at a depth that 
> > gives justice to all proposals,  might be a bit time consuming, but 
> > perhaps we need to.
> 
> Instead of reviewing proposals in depth it might make more sense
> to task somebody with doing a compare and contrast between the different
> proposals and use such a presentation as the focus for discussion.
> 
> That approach tends to lead to more focus on the problem and the possible
> approaches with less of "my proposal is better than yours" type of discussion.

Totally agree here.

We shouldn't discuss proposals, but rather talk in some "meta" 
multihoming level.

We need to have better picture what we want and can do before getting down 
to business and digging holes...

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings