Re: Mutli6 meeting in Vienna

[Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com>]

I think what would be excellent would be for someone to open the meeting
with an overview of the classes of solutions. We may need to launch parallel
efforts, so agreeing which classes of solution we want to develop is
an important first step.

  Brian

Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote:
> 
> > I am rethinking my R&R time off in July and might change my mind and
> > come to Vienna.
> > Part of my decision is are we going to meet officially as Multi6 and if
> > we do can we schedule one 2 hour offsite but not on Sunday as coming
> > from U.S. I don't want to get there on Saturday (well I can't).  Us
> > meeting would input to my decision and two other areas of the IETF I am
> > not comfortable not being at for some issues that require important
> > face-to-face discussion.
> >
> 
> We are in the clear that we should meet. What we need to work on is the
> agenda. Me and Sean have been sending some sporadic emails between
> eachother on this, but I guess we need to more a bit more here. As to
> an off-site face-to-face meeting, I would say that this is partly up to
> what the agenda would include.
> 
> I am still also open to input on the agenda and the structure of the
> meeting. From the past weeks discussions here I would assume that "GSE"
> will be a large topic, but we would need something to discuss around.
> We also have Pekkas draft and we have the option to have someone go
> through the options brought to the IETF so far (I was going through the
> ID archives but I could't find much more than my drafts, Iljitsch,
> Tonys and Michels expired drafts. Then we also have HIP. Have I missed
> something?). Opinions?
> 
> I guess that if we want to have a private session, that would be on the
> topic of identifier/locator separation ?
> 
> - kurtis -